Tooploox vs WeAreBrain: full comparison for 2026
Last updated: July 2026
Quick verdict
Tooploox (4.3/5) edges ahead of WeAreBrain (4.2/5) overall. Tooploox is the better choice for companies with genuinely hard ML and AI research-engineering problems, not standard integration work. WeAreBrain is the stronger option for companies wanting AI and machine learning delivered as part of a broader digital product build. The right choice depends on your project size, budget, and required tech stack.
Tooploox vs WeAreBrain: head-to-head summary
| Criterion | Tooploox | WeAreBrain |
|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2012 | 2015 |
| HQ | Wroclaw, Poland | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Team size | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Rating | 4.3 / 5 | 4.2 / 5 |
| Best for | Companies with genuinely hard ML and AI research-engineering problems, not standard integration work | Companies wanting AI and machine learning delivered as part of a broader digital product build |
| Pricing model | Fixed project, dedicated team | Fixed project, dedicated team |
| Min. engagement | $25K | $25K |
| Primary tech stack | Python, PyTorch, TensorFlow | Python, AWS, Azure |
| Industries served | Healthcare, Enterprise, Media, SaaS | SaaS, Fintech, Enterprise, Retail |
Tooploox vs WeAreBrain: overview
Tooploox
Tooploox, founded in 2012 and based in Wroclaw and Warsaw, Poland, is an engineering company that specifically takes on projects where AI and machine learning represent the core technical challenge, rather than treating ML as a secondary feature. Its portfolio includes a digital histopathology platform and a neural network technique (MagMax) recognized at ECCV 2024. Tooploox was named Top AI Company in Poland and Top Machine Learning Company in Poland for 2025 by Clutch.
WeAreBrain
WeAreBrain is an Amsterdam, Netherlands-headquartered digital product and AI agency founded in 2015 by Mario Grunitz, Elvire Jaspers, and Ievgen Miasushkin. The roughly 60 to 70 person team specializes in digital transformation, AI and machine learning applications, and intelligent process automation. In 2017, WeAreBrain co-founded Tur.ai, an AI and hyperautomation platform with joint Amsterdam and Kyiv operations, reflecting the founders' Ukrainian engineering ties.
Services and capabilities: Tooploox vs WeAreBrain
| Capability | Tooploox | WeAreBrain |
|---|---|---|
| ML model development | ✓ | ✓ |
| Computer vision | ✓ | ✗ |
| NLP | ✗ | ✗ |
| Generative AI / LLM integration | ✗ | ✗ |
| MLOps | ✗ | ✓ |
| AI strategy consulting | ✓ | ✓ |
| Staff augmentation | ✗ | ✗ |
Tech stack comparison: Tooploox vs WeAreBrain
| Framework / platform | Tooploox | WeAreBrain |
|---|---|---|
| Python | ✓ | ✓ |
| TensorFlow | ✓ | ✓ |
| PyTorch | ✓ | N/A |
| AWS | ✓ | ✓ |
| Azure | N/A | ✓ |
| Kubernetes | ✓ | N/A |
Pricing comparison: Tooploox vs WeAreBrain
| Criterion | Tooploox | WeAreBrain |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum engagement | $25K | $25K |
| Engagement models | Fixed project, Dedicated team | Fixed project, Dedicated team |
| Rate transparency | Minimum disclosed | Minimum disclosed |
| Price tier | Accessible | Accessible |
Target audience comparison: Tooploox vs WeAreBrain
| Dimension | Tooploox | WeAreBrain |
|---|---|---|
| Best company size | Startup to mid-market | Startup to mid-market |
| Best industries | Healthcare, Enterprise, Media | SaaS, Fintech, Enterprise |
| Best use cases | Digital histopathology and medical imaging analysis, Novel neural network architecture research and development | Building an AI-powered consumer-facing digital product, Intelligent process automation for back-office workflows |
| Typical project type | Fixed project | Fixed project |
Tooploox vs WeAreBrain: pros and cons
| Tooploox | |
|---|---|
| + | Recognized by Clutch as Top AI Company and Top Machine Learning Company in Poland for 2025 |
| + | Academic-grade research credibility, including a technique presented at ECCV 2024 |
| + | Over a decade of operating history since founding in 2012, focused specifically on hard ML problems |
| + | Domain depth in digital histopathology and healthcare computer vision |
| - | Research-oriented positioning may mean higher cost for simpler, more standard ML integration work |
| - | Mid-size team (51–200) shared across research and delivery work |
| WeAreBrain | |
|---|---|
| + | A decade of operating history since founding in 2015 as an Amsterdam-based digital product agency |
| + | Co-founded a dedicated AI and hyperautomation platform, Tur.ai, showing deeper AI investment beyond client services |
| + | Combines product design with ML and AI engineering, useful for consumer-facing AI products |
| + | EU-headquartered in the Netherlands, simplifying GDPR compliance for European clients |
| - | AI and ML is one of several practice areas alongside broader digital product work |
| - | Some delivery ties to Kyiv, Ukraine via the Tur.ai venture carry the same continuity considerations as other Ukraine-linked firms |
Who should choose Tooploox?
Tooploox is the right choice for companies with genuinely hard ML and AI research-engineering problems, not standard integration work.
Research-grade ML engineering with peer-reviewed academic recognition at ECCV 2024, alongside client delivery. Minimum engagement starts at $25K. Works best with clients in Healthcare, Enterprise, Media, SaaS.
Who should choose WeAreBrain?
WeAreBrain is the right choice for companies wanting AI and machine learning delivered as part of a broader digital product build.
Digital product agency DNA combined with a dedicated AI, ML, and intelligent automation practice. Minimum engagement starts at $25K. Works best with clients in SaaS, Fintech, Enterprise, Retail.
Decision matrix: Tooploox vs WeAreBrain
| Your situation | Recommended choice |
|---|---|
| You need full-ownership delivery on a defined project scope | Tooploox |
| You need a large dedicated team for an ongoing programme | Tooploox |
| Your budget is at the lower end | Tooploox |
| You need specialist depth in a specific vertical | Tooploox |
| You need staff augmentation or team extension | Neither; consider alternatives that offer staff aug |
| You need consulting before committing to a build | Tooploox |
Use case fit: Tooploox vs WeAreBrain
| Use case | Tooploox fit | WeAreBrain fit | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Digital histopathology and medical imaging analysis | Strong | Strong | Both equally |
| Novel neural network architecture research and development | Strong | Limited | Tooploox |
| Building an AI-powered consumer-facing digital product | Limited | Strong | WeAreBrain |
| Intelligent process automation for back-office workflows | Limited | Strong | WeAreBrain |
| Fixed-price build | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
| Staff augmentation | Limited | Limited | Both equally |
Verdict: Tooploox vs WeAreBrain
Tooploox (4.3/5) is the stronger overall choice for most Machine Learning Development projects. Research-grade ML engineering with peer-reviewed academic recognition at ECCV 2024, alongside client delivery. It is best for companies with genuinely hard ML and AI research-engineering problems, not standard integration work.
WeAreBrain (4.2/5) is the better choice when companies wanting AI and machine learning delivered as part of a broader digital product build. If your situation matches those criteria, WeAreBrain is a competitive option.
Related comparisons
Tooploox vs WeAreBrain FAQ
Is Tooploox better than WeAreBrain?
Tooploox (4.3/5) scores higher overall, but "better" depends on your use case. Tooploox is better for companies with genuinely hard ML and AI research-engineering problems, not standard integration work. WeAreBrain is better for companies wanting AI and machine learning delivered as part of a broader digital product build.
How do Tooploox and WeAreBrain differ in pricing?
Tooploox uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K. WeAreBrain uses fixed project, dedicated team pricing with a minimum engagement of $25K. Neither firm publishes a full rate card; a discovery call is required for project-specific quotes.
Which is better for enterprise: Tooploox or WeAreBrain?
Tooploox is the larger team and typically the better enterprise-scale choice. For very large programmes, verify team size and compliance coverage directly with each company before shortlisting.
What are the main differences between Tooploox and WeAreBrain?
Tooploox's primary differentiator is: research-grade ml engineering with peer-reviewed academic recognition at eccv 2024, alongside client delivery. WeAreBrain's primary differentiator is: digital product agency dna combined with a dedicated ai, ml, and intelligent automation practice. They also differ in team size (51–200 vs 51–200), minimum engagement ($25K vs $25K), and primary industries served (Healthcare, Enterprise vs SaaS, Fintech).
Last reviewed: July 2026. Verify all details directly with each company before making a decision.